Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;332:187-188 (28 January), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7535.187
Mainly patients with endoscopically proved peptic ulcer or functional dyspepsia
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Dyspepsia has most recently been defined as predominant epigastric pain present for at least four weeks, with or without heartburn.1 By implication gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) refers to predominant heartburn. These definitions work reasonably well when peptic ulcer has been excluded by endoscopy, but they fail to be sufficiently predictive in uninvestigated patients.2 Thus the guideline on dyspepsia produced by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) in 2004 recommended a common pathway for investigating and treating previously uninvestigated patients who had both heartburn and epigastric pain.3 Patients who have had endoscopy can be categorised according to the cause foundpeptic ulcer, oesophagitis, or no obvious cause (functional dyspepsia or functional heartburn).
Eradication of Helicobacter pylori is most effective in preventing the recurrence of duodenal ulcer: the number needed to treat (NNT) for preventing one recurrence of ulceration at one year is 2.4 It now seems naive to
Brendan C Delaney, professor of primary care
University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT
(b.c.delaney@bham.ac.uk)
Helicobacter pylori positive (CADET-Hp) randomised controlled trial