BMJ  2006;332:180 (21 January), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7534.180

Letter

Patients get four choices for NHS treatments

Choose and book has not left the station

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Editor—UK general practitioners have no contractual obligation to offer patients a choice of provider.¹ My practice calculated that with some 50 elective referrals to hospital each week we would need to spend nearly £4500 this year for additional staff time to implement the service (patient population 6400). If we do receive the £0.95 per patient as payment for implementing the whole "Connecting 4 Health" package of which choose and book is but a part, my practice may achieve a net profit before tax of nearly £1500.

This is meagre compensation for the three partners, who must devote additional time and effort to assist staff to implement choose and book for our patients, although evidence of the clinical benefit for my patients is lacking. The additional time per appointment that may ensue will reduce our overall availability to see patients, thus jeopardising our facility to see everyone within 48 hours. Is . . . [Full text of this article]

Tudor Surgery, Watford WD24 7PH david.lewis@nhs.net

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Patients’ attendance at clinics is worse with choose and book

Prince Cheriyan Modayil, Rachael Hornigold, Raad John Glore, and David A Bowdler
BMJ 2009 338: b396. [Extract] [Full Text]

Singing the body electronic

Tony Delamothe
BMJ 2006 332: 0. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Lords recommend “passive immunisation” if bird flu reaches UK

Michael Day
BMJ 2006 332: 8. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Modayil, P. C., Hornigold, R., Glore, R. J., Bowdler, D. A (2009). Patients' attendance at clinics is worse with choose and book. BMJ 338: b396-b396 [Full text]  

Online poll

Find out more >>