Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;332:178 (21 January), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7534.178-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EditorThe relative risk for associated factors should not be confused with the attributable risk for causative factors. Li et al express the risk associated with sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) and use of a dummy (pacifier) during sleep as a 90% reduction in risk, which could be potentially misunderstood and brings unwarranted media attention to what otherwise is a very interesting paper.1
| |||||||||||
Any calculation of attributable risk would be limited to the prevalence of exposure, which for dummy users in the Californian infant population would be 23% (based on the control data). However, projecting risk reduction or quantifying attributable risk in this study is inappropriate. As the authors point out in the discussion, a causal effect between dummy use and SIDS has not been established. The discrepancy in dummy use has already been reported in previous larger studies,2-4 with better ascertainment levels providing a more cautious interpretation of the data.
Peter S Blair, research fellow
Institute of Child Life and Health, University of Bristol, Bristol BS2 8AE p.s.blair@bris.ac.uk
Peter J Fleming, professor of infant health and developmental physiology
Institute of Child Life and Health, University of Bristol, Bristol BS2 8AE