Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;332:61-62 (14 January), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7533.61
Cervical screening using HPV testing shows great promise but warrants caution
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Increased understanding of human papilloma-viruses (HPV) and cervical carcinogenesis has led to prevention strategies that are very promising. Two articles in this issue (pp 79, 83) find that DNA testing for HPV is a cost effective way to clarify the meaning of equivocal results of cervical cytology.1 2
Cervical HPV infections are very common, particularly among young women, and are sexually transmitted.3 They usually clear within one or two years. However, persistent infections by 15 or so carcinogenic HPV genotypes cause most cases of cervical precancer, which is generally diagnosed years after the causal infection, and of invasive cancer, which is typically diagnosed at least two decades after infection.4
Reproducible methods for testing for HPV are already available that are more sensitive (but less specific) than cytology for detecting prevalent and incipient precancer and cancer.5 Testing for HPV might be used to improve the four sequential steps of
Mark Schiffman, senior investigator
Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
(schiffmm@mail.nih.gov)
Philip E Castle, investigator
Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+