Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;332:118 (14 January), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7533.118-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EditorFleminger and Ponsford in their editorial on long term outcome after traumatic brain injury highlight the need for more attention to be paid to neuropsychiatric functioning.1 The authors say that early assessments after injury concentrate more on physical disability than cognition.
Our experience is that neither is tackled adequately. In 2000 we set up the Eastern Region Head Injury Study Group to quantify the requirements of patients with traumatic brain injury. This has identified major deficiencies in the rehabilitation of these patients with absolutely no provision for rapid assess rehabilitation in the east of England.2 The tendency for patients being left to languish on general medical, surgical, and orthopaedic wards continues to their detriment and to the detriment of those requiring admission to acute district general hospital beds. In a six month period, 37 patients with major head injury were transferred back from the regional neurosurgical unit to inappropriate district
Peter J Hutchinson, senior academy fellow
Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ pjah2@cam.ac.uk
John D Pickard, professor of neurosurgery
Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ
Read all Rapid Responses