Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;332:1-2 (7 January), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7532.1
We want it to be a great magazine as well as a great journal
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The BMJ is evolving, and with this first issue of 2006 you will see some changes. The most obvious of these are some new section headings, but wider changes are afoot which will culminate in a redesign of the journal in July.
The changes stem from a series of conversations we have had with doctors, healthcare researchers, and policy makers in the UK and overseas. These have told us a lot about how people use information and what they look for in the BMJ. They confirmed what we know to be the BMJ's strengthsbroad appeal across medicine and health care, reputation for courage and integrity, mix of serious science and analysis with practically useful material, readability, hard hitting journalism, and entertaining comment. But they also told us that readers are confused about what the BMJ is and who it is for. Is it mainly for general practitioners
Fiona Godlee, editor
BMJ, London WC1H 9JR
(fgodlee@bmj.com)
Read all Rapid Responses
UK medical students have published unreleased government plans to restrict failed asylum seekers' access to medical care