Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;331:1339-1340 (3 December), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7528.1339-c
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORCole highlights some of the challenges to the proposals to reform research support from the Department of Health,1-3 but the need to restore academic medicine does not reflect an intrinsic failure. Rather, it has been a victim of financial constraints, and clinical research has been marginalised in an increasingly citation and commercial focused academic environment.
The proposed creation of a virtual National Institute of Health Research could provide a powerful national voice for academic medicine at a time of unprecedented change, facilitate research collaboration, and build a national networked research expertise. Several fundamental consequences of the decline of clinical academic medicine, however, seem not to have been fully appreciated.
The central paradigm behind the success of academic medicine has been the two way interaction between "bench and bed-side." The Department of Health proposals emphasise support for "research involving patients." This would be much too narrow a concept. The
D J Sheridan, professor of cardiology
Imperial College School of Medicine, Academic Cardiology Unit, St Mary's Hospital, London W2 1NY d.sheridan@ic.ac.uk
Read all Rapid Responses