BMJ  2005;331:1338 (3 December), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7528.1338-a

Letter

Challenges of private provision in the NHS

Real story is beginning to emerge

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR—Timmins's argument that the NHS has never been exclusively "public sector" is misleading.1 It obscures the astonishing growth and concentration of corporate power in the health sector. When the NHS was created, pharmaceutical companies were in their infancy, whereas today they rank among the most powerful corporations in the world.

Throughout the NHS's history, most general practitioners have been independent contractors. However, the BMA's survey of general practitioners' opinion in 2001 showed that most doctors now see themselves as part of the NHS and do not want a greater role for private companies in primary care.2 Even "entrepreneurial" doctors are hardly in the same league as multinational private firms.

The involvement of big business is already damaging the NHS. The private finance initiative (PFI) and its latest incarnation, local improvement finance trust (LIFT), hand over control of hospitals and surgeries to private consortia, which view them not primarily . . . [Full text of this article]

Rachel Aldred, researcher

Goldsmiths College, University of London, London SE14 6NW Rachel.Aldred@gold.ac.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Challenges of private provision in the NHS
Nicholas Timmins
BMJ 2005 331: 1193-1195. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ