Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;331 (3 December), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7528.0-f
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Imagine that you have just been told that your child has cancer. As the news sinks in, you are likely to want to know what the best treatment is and to be assured that your child will get it. You may not want to hear that we don't know what the best treatment is and that the only way to find out for sure is to enter your child into a trial.
If a parent's decision is hard, so too is the job of the trialist. With a child's future in the balance, how comfortable are you that encouraging a parent to enrol is in the best interests of that child? This week's BMJ carries an important paper that may make your job easier. Ambuj Kumar and colleagues (p 1295) looked back at a cohort of consecutive trials of treatments for cancer in children. Their aim was to
Fiona Godlee, editor
(fgodlee@bmj.com)
Read all Rapid Responses
Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.