Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;331:1271 (26 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7527.1271-b
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORCrotty et al show that transitional, or intermediate, care facilities can be used to divert older people safely from hospital to a care home setting.1 Our randomised controlled trial had similar findings,2 but we could not exclude the possibility that such transitional care increases long term institutionalisation over a longer period of follow-up (12 months, compared with four months in the study by Crotty et al). Young et al's whole system study in Leeds showed that intermediate care services increased admissions to hospital.3 So, intermediate care can sometimes reduce hospital admission and sometimes it does not. It is not guaranteed to lead to outcomes that are equivalent to those of the services being replaced.
This inconsistency of the evidence base raises the question of whether findings obtained in controlled research studies of services can be generalised to other times and settings. If not, the fears previously raised about
John R Gladman, reader in the medicine of older people
Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH
john.gladman@nottingham.ac.uk
UK medical students have published unreleased government plans to restrict failed asylum seekers' access to medical care