Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;331:1271 (26 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7527.1271-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORCrotty et al show that off-site "transitional care" facilities for elderly patients already assessed as needing residential care placement, only reduce length of hospital stay at the expense of delaying eventual transfer to a long term care facility.1 However, their assertion that such transfer resulted in no difference in mortality, rates of readmission, or the proportion of patients who eventually returned to their own homes is potentially misleading, as the study was not powered to detect such differences. Sample size was calculated only to detect "a mean reduction in length of stay of 10 days (SD 25) in the treatment group"that is, to test the hypothesis that opening a new off-site facility and transferring inpatients to this facility would reduce length of stay (arguably a "given").
Over the four month follow-up, patients in the treatment group had a 12% relative increase in readmissions (28% in treatment group v
Martin J Connolly, senior lecturer in medicine (geriatrics)
University of Manchester, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester M13 9WL
martin.connolly@cmmc.nhs.uk