Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;331:1203 (19 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7526.1203
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORWhy does the BMJ, which promotes itself as a journal dedicated to evidence based medicine, publish an editorial that talks only of the hazard ratio of a treatment without any reference to the absolute reduction in recurrence observed?1
From the original paper I calculate the absolute reduction in recurrence rate at one year with trastuzumab to be 5.5%,2 giving a number needed to treat of 18 (rather than the 13 mentioned by Grove [letter in this cluster]).
There was no reduction in total mortality (no "lives saved"), but this might be due to the limited follow-up.
Although the exact figures may change with further experience this means, at present, that of 100 suitable patients given the drug for a year, 94 will have been exposed to the (not insignificant) side effects without any effect on their outcome at one year and the taxpayer (in the United Kingdom)
E Hamish McLaren, retired consultant physician
Badmany House, Beith, Ayrshire KA15 2JL handsmclaren@btinternet.com