BMJ  2005;331:1202 (19 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7526.1202-b

Letter

Adjuvant trastuzumab for breast cancer

An increasingly common ethical and economic conundrum

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR—The advent of increasingly expensive and effective treatments over the next few years is likely to make this kind of ethical discussion even more common.1

However, the £20 000 headline figure for a course of trastuzumab obscures the real cost of using this agent. In the original paper 261 adverse outcomes occurred in 1679 patients receiving placebo and 133 in 1672 patients receiving trastuzumab2; the published relative risk reduction of 0.48 obscures the number needed to treat (NNT) of 13 (95% confidence interval 10 to 18). From a cost effectiveness point of view, £260 000 in trastuzumab buys only one additional patient a disease free survival. This may be a worthwhile investment, but in a hard pressed NHS for the same sum you can't help thinking that it could pay for an additional consultant oncologist, or a bevy of extra specialist nurses.

If testing for HER2/neu gene . . . [Full text of this article]

Matthew L Grove, consultant rheumatologist

Tyneside General Hospital, North Shields NE29 8NH Matthew.Grove@northumbria-healthcare.nhs.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Adjuvant trastuzumab for breast cancer
Rebecca Dent and Mark Clemons
BMJ 2005 331: 1035-1036. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Erratum
Matthew L Grove
bmj.com, 18 Nov 2005 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ