BMJ  2005;331:1148 (12 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7525.1148

reviews

Press

Why can't the Daily Mail eat humble pie over MMR?

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The recent publication of a Cochrane systematic review concluding that there is "no credible evidence" of a link between the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine and either inflammatory bowel disease or autism provoked demands that the British tabloid newspaper the Daily Mail apologise for its role in promoting the MMR-autism scare (http://www.mrw.interscience.wiley.com/cochrane/clsysrev/articles/CD004407/frame.html). Instead, on 31 October, the paper published a feature by leading columnist Melanie Phillips insisting that claims that MMR was safe were "a load of old baloney" (www.melaniephillips.com). Phillips proclaimed that, far from having received the "all-clear," the "MMR scandal" was "getting worse."

The otherwise unanimous verdict of the media was that the Cochrane review—following a series of studies coming to the same conclusion—confirmed that the scare launched following the now notorious Andrew Wakefield Lancet paper in 1998 was finally over ( Lancet 1998;351: 637[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]). Phillips's defiant . . . [Full text of this article]

London fitz@easynet.co.uk

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Related Articles

Hit parade
BMJ 2005 331: 1481. [Extract] [Full Text]

High Court judge criticises Andrew Wakefield for trying to silence his critics

Clare Dyer
BMJ 2005 331: 1104. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• (2005). Hit parade. BMJ 331: 1481-1481 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Phillips was answered

Neville W Goodman
bmj.com, 11 Nov 2005 [Full text]

Autism and MMR - no fiasco.

Michael D Innis
bmj.com, 11 Nov 2005 [Full text]

Why should the Daily Mail eat humble pie?

John Stone
bmj.com, 11 Nov 2005 [Full text]

On the limitations of RCTs and meta-analyses.

Richard G Fiddian-Green
bmj.com, 12 Nov 2005 [Full text]

Re: On the limitations of RCTs and meta-analyses.

Andrew D Hutchinson
bmj.com, 12 Nov 2005 [Full text]

Do RCTs overlook confounding?

David Pitches
bmj.com, 13 Nov 2005 [Full text]

Medical profession record on autism?

Jenny L Robertson
bmj.com, 14 Nov 2005 [Full text]

What's woeful

Malcolm E Kendrick
bmj.com, 14 Nov 2005 [Full text]

Eight years on

John Stone
bmj.com, 14 Nov 2005 [Full text]

What has to be done to lay this issue to rest?

Onisillos Sekkides
bmj.com, 14 Nov 2005 [Full text]

Re: What has to be done to lay this issue to rest?

John Stone
bmj.com, 15 Nov 2005 [Full text]

Re: This is What Has to Be Done to Lay This Issue to Rest

Clifford G Miller
bmj.com, 15 Nov 2005 [Full text]

Humble Pie Not on Menu

Clifford G. Miller
bmj.com, 15 Nov 2005 [Full text]

Humble pie?

John P Heptonstall
bmj.com, 19 Nov 2005 [Full text]

Re: What has to be done to lay this issue to rest?

Charles R Whiting
bmj.com, 19 Nov 2005 [Full text]

Re: Re: What has to be done to lay this issue to rest?

Onisillos Sekkides
bmj.com, 17 Nov 2005 [Full text]

Re:Re: What has to be done to lay this issue to rest?

Joseph R. Herr
bmj.com, 18 Nov 2005 [Full text]

Brain abnormalities at birth in autism

Ellen C G Grant
bmj.com, 18 Nov 2005 [Full text]

A question for Michael Fitzpatrick from an anxious member of the middle-classes

John Stone
bmj.com, 19 Nov 2005 [Full text]

Re: What has to be done to lay this issue to rest?

Lisa C Blakemore-Brown
bmj.com, 19 Nov 2005 [Full text]

Why we are in this position in the first place.

Hilary Butler
bmj.com, 20 Nov 2005 [Full text]

Cochrane, research bias and Dr Wakefield

John Stone
bmj.com, 22 Nov 2005 [Full text]

"The Next MMR" - but what about the present one?

John Stone
bmj.com, 25 Nov 2005 [Full text]

BBC: MMR not impacting on measles?

John Stone
bmj.com, 15 Feb 2008 [Full text]