Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;331:1033-1034 (5 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7524.1033
Surveillance of patients not covered by established criteria is controversial
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
| What is ordinary? The single case! What is special? Millions of cases!
|
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749-1832)1
Management of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is a textbook example for the translation of molecular knowledge into clinical decision making. Different mutations in mismatch repair genes were identified on the basis of clustering of colorectal and associated cancers in affected families. In the meantime adequate proof that colonoscopic surveillance indeed reduces incidence of and morbidity from HNPCC had been obtained.2 The situation, however, is less clear in individuals at moderate risk of colorectal cancer because of a positive family history but not fulfilling any of the Amsterdam or Bethesda criteria.3 4 Dove-Edwin and colleagues have to be commended for providing urgently needed data on this group of patients in their paper in this week's BMJ.5
In 1913 Aldred Warthin, a pathologist, published a family pedigree including several hereditary tumours6 that matches
Hanns-Peter Knaebel, consultant surgeon
(hanns-peter.knaebel@med.uni-heidelberg.de)
Department of Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
Peter Kienle, consultant surgeon
Department of Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.