Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;331:977-978 (29 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7523.977
Complex educational interventions demand complex and appropriate evaluations
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
How can we ever be sure that educational approaches such as problem based learning are better than traditional ones? Change merely for the sake of change is futile. Changes in medical education should lead to better outcomes, but what is the best way to show cause and effect?
For simple research questions straightforward methods suffice, but more complex questions require more complicated study designs. A question such as "Is drug A more effective than a placebo?" is highly relevant, and the methods needed to answer it may be relatively straightforward. However, the question "Why does drug A lead to a better outcome than a placebo?" is more complicated, and "Does using drug A lead to better health for the population?" even more so. Answering more complicated questions often requires a programme of research rather than a single study.
Some authors would say that a randomised controlled trial is the
Lambert Schuwirth, associate professor
Department of Educational Development and Research, Maastricht University, Netherlands (l.schuwirth@educ.unimaas.nl)
Peter Cantillon, senior lecturer
Department of General Practice, National University of Ireland, Galway, Republic of Ireland