Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;331:1023 (29 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7523.1023-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORThe government's recent announcement that all early stage breast cancer patients are to be tested for HER2 overexpression with a view to receiving trastuzumab (Herceptin) will no doubt be a great relief to both patients and oncologists.1
However, this raises several important issues.
Firstly, the government may be setting a dangerous precedent in effectively promoting off-licence indications for a pharmaceutical (what oncologist, presented with a patient who could benefit from this drug, will not use his or her clinical discretion to prescribe it off-label?).
Secondly, it is pre-empting the evaluations of both the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products (EMEA, the licensing agency) and the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), the body set up to advise the government on value for money in the NHS.
But most importantly, it highlights the terrible decisions necessary in any health system: the oncologist sees a sick
Edward C F Wilson, research associate
Health Economics Group, School of Medicine, Health Policy and Practice, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ ed.wilson@uea.ac.uk