BMJ  2005;331:1022 (29 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7523.1022

Letter

ASCOT: a tale of two treatment regimens

Don't lose your head over ASCOT

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR—McDougall et al reviewed the evidence from ASCOT (the Anglo Scandinavian cardiac outcomes trial).1 For patients with hypertension and for the clinicians helping to manage their blood pressure this must be the best of times and the worst of times. The best of times—currently we have a wealth of clinical trials on the management of blood pressure, giving us a mass of data, statistics and information to absorb. The worst of times—whenever a new trial is published, the headlines are presented as though the paper gives the missing clue to a previously unsolvable riddle. Often the media are alerted, and unhelpful and simplistic messages are broadcast to the nation.

ASCOT merely adds to our understanding of the importance of managing blood pressure effectively. It does not cancel out the key trials of the past. In the same way ALLHAT gives an indication of the benefit of diuretics in . . . [Full text of this article]

-->

David G Phizackerley, prescribing team manager

Western Sussex Primary Care Trust, Chichester PO19 6FX david.phizackerley@wsx-pct.nhs.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

ASCOT: a tale of two treatment regimens
Claire McDougall, Adrian J B Brady, and John R Petrie
BMJ 2005 331: 859-860. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ