Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;331:967 (22 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7522.967-b
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORSimms and O'Neill point out the problems posed by a particular class of private motor vehicles (sports utility vehicles, SUVs) to one group of other road users.1 The danger posed by SUVs is simply a more extreme version of the problems posed by all motor vehicles to all other road users, not just elderly pedestrians.
The fundamental reason for a higher involvement of SUVs in pedestrian and other road user road traffic accidents is that SUV drivers feel better protected in their vehicle than in smaller motor vehicles. SUVs are frequently advertised as being "safer" than smaller vehicles and give the impression of crashworthiness to potential buyers irrespective of any advertising campaigns.
The common sense knowledge that road users adapt to their perception of dangergenerally referred to as "risk compensation"2 or "adaptive behaviour"is well documented.3 Thus, the danger from SUVs comes at least partly from a tendency by
Robert A Davis, policy adviser
Road Danger Reduction Forum, London NW10 2AS rdavis4499@aol.com
UK medical students have published unreleased government plans to restrict failed asylum seekers' access to medical care