Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;331:926 (22 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7522.926
Michael Day
London
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
A new report has cast doubt on the government's claim that foundation trusts will prove more accountable to local communities. The year long study of Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust in east London by the health charity the King's Fund shows disillusionment among its governors.
The trust was one of the first to gain foundation status. Many of the governors complain that they have had little or no influence on how the hospital is run. Boards of governors, which consist mainly of members of the public, were supposed to be the watchdogs that gave local people a greater say in the running of foundation trusts.
But Richard Lewis, the report's author, said, "There's a sense among the governors that they have no idea what they're actually supposed to be doing.
"If governors have little real influence it will be hard to claim that foundation trusts represent a leap forward
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?