BMJ  2005;331:859-860 (15 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7521.859

Editorial

ASCOT: a tale of two treatment regimens

Better blood pressure, fewer deaths, and less diabetes with newer antihypertensive agents

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Each year in the United Kingdom alone there are 20 000 preventable deaths from cardiovascular disease attributable to hypertension. Much of the excess mortality and associated morbidity arises from poor control of blood pressure among people known to have hypertension. For the past two years in the United Kingdom, general practitioners have had the prime responsibility for tackling this problem, along with financial incentives to meet targets for detecting and controlling high blood pressure. Yet, despite many clinical trials and guidelines, they may be unsure about which antihypertensive drug to use first and how to combine treatments.

In 2004 the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) recommended thiazide or thiazide-like diuretics as the first line treatment for most patients, with the addition of {beta} blockers as the next step.w1 This echoed the advice given in the US Joint National Committee's guidelines the previous year.w2 Near simultaneous guidance from . . . [Full text of this article]

Claire McDougall, NovoNordisk Research Foundation clinical research fellow

Division of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, Western Infirmary, Glasgow G11 6NT

Adrian J B Brady, consultant cardiologist

Queen Elizabeth Building, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow G31 2ER

John R Petrie, reader in diabetic medicine

Division of Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY (j.r.petrie@dundee.ac.uk)


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Hit parade
BMJ 2005 331: 1277. [Extract] [Full Text]

ASCOT: a tale of two treatment regimens: Don't lose your head over ASCOT
David G Phizackerley
BMJ 2005 331: 1022. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

ASCOT: a tale of two treatment regimens: Is ASCOT-BPLA being hyped-up?
Peter D Burrill
BMJ 2005 331: 1022. [Extract] [Full Text]

ASCOT: a tale of two treatment regimens: Odds are that it's hype
Martin G Duerden
BMJ 2005 331: 1022-1023. [Extract] [Full Text]

ASCOT: a tale of two treatment regimens: Is ASCOT all it's cracked up to be?
James A Cave
BMJ 2005 331: 1023. [Extract] [Full Text]

Angiotensin receptor blockers and risk of myocardial infarction: systematic review
Michael A McDonald, Scot H Simpson, Justin A Ezekowitz, Gabor Gyenes, and Ross T Tsuyuki
BMJ 2005 331: 873. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • (2005). Hit parade. BMJ 331: 1277-1277 [Full text]  
  • Phizackerley, D. G (2005). ASCOT: a tale of two treatment regimens: Don't lose your head over ASCOT. BMJ 331: 1022-1022 [Full text]  
  • Cave, J. A (2005). ASCOT: a tale of two treatment regimens: Is ASCOT all it's cracked up to be?. BMJ 331: 1023-1023 [Full text]  
  • Burrill, P. D (2005). ASCOT: a tale of two treatment regimens: Is ASCOT-BPLA being hyped-up?. BMJ 331: 1022-1022 [Full text]  
  • Duerden, M. G (2005). ASCOT: a tale of two treatment regimens: Odds are that it's hype. BMJ 331: 1022-1023 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

doxazosin
Harvey D Sanders
bmj.com, 14 Oct 2005 [Full text]
Should we be second guessing NICE/BHS?
Matthew Robinson
bmj.com, 14 Oct 2005 [Full text]
But are ARBs any better?
Onisillos Sekkides
bmj.com, 14 Oct 2005 [Full text]
“Where there is discord, may we bring harmony. Where there is error, may we bring truth.”
Des Spence
bmj.com, 14 Oct 2005 [Full text]
Don't lose your head over ASCOT
David G Phizackerley
bmj.com, 14 Oct 2005 [Full text]
If atenolol is a wise choice, depends on the point of view.
Thomas Kuehlein
bmj.com, 14 Oct 2005 [Full text]
Critical Appraisal Exercices are more useful than opinions
Teresa Molina
bmj.com, 15 Oct 2005 [Full text]
Is ASCOT-BPLA being hyped-up?
Peter D Burrill
bmj.com, 15 Oct 2005 [Full text]
Betting on ASCOT changing practice? Odds are that it’s hype.
Martin G Duerden
bmj.com, 16 Oct 2005 [Full text]
ASCOT study can't provide guidelines for treatment of hypertension in the general population
Fernando Prattichizzo, et al.
bmj.com, 16 Oct 2005 [Full text]
Two more arguments why ASCOT should not lead to reconsideration of thiazide diuretics as first step in a first line treatment
Dirk Van Duppen
bmj.com, 16 Oct 2005 [Full text]
I do not seek. I find.
BM Hegde
bmj.com, 16 Oct 2005 [Full text]
Ascot: All it's cracked up to be?
James A Cave
bmj.com, 17 Oct 2005 [Full text]
What level of competing interests?
Kevin P Barraclough
bmj.com, 17 Oct 2005 [Full text]
"LIFE" for thiazides,yet.
John S Ashcroft
bmj.com, 17 Oct 2005 [Full text]
ASCOT soundbites........or 40 years of evidence on the treatment of hypertension?
Neal Maskrey, et al.
bmj.com, 17 Oct 2005 [Full text]
The burden of hypertension in the UK: are GPs really to blame?
Raj Thakkar
bmj.com, 19 Oct 2005 [Full text]
"Absence of proof is not proof of absence"
Steve Williams
bmj.com, 21 Oct 2005 [Full text]
Advice for the guideline makers
David G Taylor
bmj.com, 21 Oct 2005 [Full text]
ASCOT - what about other beta-blockers
Bhavisha Pattani MRPharmS
bmj.com, 21 Oct 2005 [Full text]
ASCOT: We have seen it all before
David F. Blackburn
bmj.com, 26 Oct 2005 [Full text]
An unfair comparison, an unhelpful interpretation.
Brett D Montgomery
bmj.com, 26 Oct 2005 [Full text]
Old or new drugs for hypertension? Don't worry, it's the same!
Giulio Rigon, et al.
bmj.com, 7 Nov 2005 [Full text]
The ASCOT-study – a more balanced view
Knud Landmark, et al.
bmj.com, 8 Nov 2005 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ