Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;331:846 (8 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7520.846-b
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORThe use of the phrase "epidemic of pregnancy in middle age"1 is loaded with value judgments and implies that pregnancy in middle age is akin to a disease. An epidemic by definition is a widespread occurrence of an infectious disease in a community at a particular time or a sudden, widespread occurrence of an undesirable phenomenon. In the words of Bewley et al,1 most pregnancies in women older than 35 have good outcomes. Childbearing late in life carries "risk," but risk itself is not a disease, and there is little evidence that women in general are unaware of these risks, particularly those who elect to have children later in life.
Bewley et al are right to target social and economic conditions influencing women's reproductive choices but give no evidence to substantiate their sweeping judgment that "women want it all." The probable truth is that women or couples turn
Ray Noble, co-director
Centre for Reproductive Ethics and Rights, University College London, London WC1E 6BT r.noble@ucl.ac.uk