Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;331:846 (8 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7520.846
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORFree choices about having children cannot be made with partial knowledge, economic disadvantage for mothers, and unsupportive workplaces.1 I believe that Bewley et al are absolutely right in this and in their following argument for better support for mothers citing the cost to the state and employers of women delaying pregnancywhich got a little lost in the media furore about women "defying nature."
However, meanwhile women remain caught in the dilemma: to delay pregnancy and incur the risks, or to have children and lose out on career opportunities, earnings, and pension. Although it remains important to strive for better support for mothers in the future, they have to choose in a current climate that is as unsupportive as the authors described. This means that advice concentrating on the risks of pregnancy after 35 could increase this dilemma and instil a sense of guilt and selfishness, while not addressing
Antje Lindenmeyer, research associate in primary care
University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL A.Lindenmeyer@warwick.ac.uk