BMJ  2005;331:846 (8 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7520.846

Letter

Which career first?

Women remain caught in dilemma

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR—Free choices about having children cannot be made with partial knowledge, economic disadvantage for mothers, and unsupportive workplaces.1 I believe that Bewley et al are absolutely right in this and in their following argument for better support for mothers citing the cost to the state and employers of women delaying pregnancy—which got a little lost in the media furore about women "defying nature."

However, meanwhile women remain caught in the dilemma: to delay pregnancy and incur the risks, or to have children and lose out on career opportunities, earnings, and pension. Although it remains important to strive for better support for mothers in the future, they have to choose in a current climate that is as unsupportive as the authors described. This means that advice concentrating on the risks of pregnancy after 35 could increase this dilemma and instil a sense of guilt and selfishness, while not addressing . . . [Full text of this article]

Antje Lindenmeyer, research associate in primary care

University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL A.Lindenmeyer@warwick.ac.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Which career first?
Susan Bewley, Melanie Davies, and Peter Braude
BMJ 2005 331: 588-589. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ