Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;331:844 (8 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7520.844-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORAs Bhutta has noted,1 ensuring that human resources in health services are appropriate remains a problem in many low and middle income countries. The renewed interest in community or lay health worker programmes is partly a result of this, and also of the growing understanding of the important roles that lay people can have in supporting treatment and care for people with HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and many other chronic illnesses.
To my knowledge, a recently completed Cochrane systematic review of the effects of lay health workers in primary and community health care is the first attempt to summarise the global evidence from randomised controlled trials on the effectiveness of such interventions.2 Based on 43 trials, it shows that deployment of such workers shows promising benefitsfor example, in promoting immunisation uptake and improving outcomes for acute respiratory infections and malariawhen compared with usual care. It also highlights a wide range
Simon Lewin, lecturer
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT simon.lewin@lshtm.ac.uk