Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;331:844 (8 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7520.844
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORAs an adviser to district health managers on priority setting, I am concerned with the constant return to a call for more research on cost effectiveness as the solution to improved implementation of health services in developing countries.1 Cost effectiveness information is useful, but it is far from adequate when a district health manager needs to make a decision and include stakeholders for priority setting.
To know if one intervention against malaria is more cost effective than another against HIV/AIDS, is for all practical purposes useless information to a district policy maker. This type of information is only really useful when they have to choose between two interventions tackling the same challenge. The district health manager is up against a range of stakeholders, all with differing values and criteria for setting priorities. Cost effectiveness is only one of them.2 Unless they have tools to also measure and include
Øystein E Olsen, senior health systems research adviser
Primary Health Care Institute, Iringa, Tanzania
oystein.olsen@cih.uib.no