Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;331:841-842 (8 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7520.841-c
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORBranthwaite makes it all sound simple.1 For the assisted dying lobby, autonomy is the ruling principle in medical ethics. It trumps all other principles. But there is a deep irony here: death abolishes autonomy. Dead men cannot choose. So if you really respect autonomy, you have to be very careful about giving autonomy its head.
Of course if people are simply asked: "Would you like to be in control when you die?" most would say that they would. But being truly in control means being in possession of sufficient information to make an informed choice, as well as being in a state of mind properly to consider that information.
Sufficient information, in the case of a truly autonomous assisted dying, must mean all relevant information: there will be no chance to review things later. Few people at the stage of considering assisted dying for themselves will have either
Charles A Foster, barrister
Outer Temple Chambers, London WC2R 1BA charles.foster@outertemple.com