Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;331:841 (8 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7520.841
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORDelamothe states that the Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) has a neutral stance on the issue of assisted dying.1 This is no longer correct.
At a meeting of the college council in June 2005 it was decided, by a clear majority, that the college could no longer maintain a neutral stance on the subject of assisted dying. To determine a definitive position on whether to oppose any future legislative change the college sought further views from its faculties and membership. After careful consideration of the views received and further debate at a meeting of its council on 16 September 2005 the college issued the following position statement:
|
"The RCGP believes that with current improvements in palliative care, good clinical care can be provided within existing legislation and that patients can die with dignity. A change in legislation is not needed."
I also issued the following statement: "This
Mayur K Lakhani, chairman
Royal College of General Practitioners, London SW7 1PU mlakhani@rcgp.org.uk