Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;331:792-793 (8 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7520.792
It may have failed in the United Kingdom, but that won't stop it being exported
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
For health professionals working in hospitals that had been starved of investment for decades, often in buildings that were crumbling around them, the United Kingdom's private finance initiative (PFI) must have seemed like a dream come true. Rather than finding the money up front to rebuild hospitals, managers could enter into a contract with a private company or a consortium to finance the building and guarantee that the facilities would be maintained long into the future. In turn the hospital trust would pay an annual fee to cover the costs of financing the project (adjusted for the risk assumed by the private company) and of maintenance. Suddenly it became possible to escape the constraints imposed by buildings that, in many cases, had been designed to meet the needs of the population a century earlier.
The initial enthusiasm by many hospital boards was easy to understand, as the Department of
Rifat A Atun, director
(r.atun@imperial.ac.uk)
Centre for Health Management, Tanaka Business School, Imperial College, London SW7 2PG
Martin McKee, professor of European public health
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT
expansion or contraction?