BMJ 2005;331:762-765 (1 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7519.762
Education and debate
Removing user fees for primary care in Africa: the need for careful action
Lucy Gilson, associate professor1,
Di McIntyre, associate professor2
1 Centre for Health Policy University of Witwatersrand, PO Box 1038, Johannesburg 2000, South Africa,
2 Health Economics Unit, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Observatory, 7925, South Africa
Correspondence to: L Gilson Lucy.gilson@nhls.ac.za
Current calls for the removal of user fees respond to evidence of their regressive impacts and their role in enhancing social exclusionbut removal must be carefully managed because this action may have negative impacts on the wider health system
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Introduction
User fees are once again a topic of hot policy debate in Africa.
They were introduced relatively recently in many countries (box
1), but the current call is for their removal, particularly
at primary care level.
2 As analysts who have consistently argued
against user fees, we broadly support this call. However, we
recognise that this action cannot be introduced overnight and,
if weakly implemented, may exacerbate the problems facing African
health systems. We outline both why we believe African countries
should move away from user fees, and what actions should accompany
their removal to ensure that this policy change strengthens
rather than undermines healthcare provision. Our suggestions
are based on the experience of countries such as South Africa
and Uganda that have already removed some or all fees, as well
as wider experience of policy change.
Why should fees be removed?
User fees are the most regressive form of healthcare financing
available; they contribute to
. . . [Full text of this article]
Mobilising and allocating resources
Effective implementation strategies
Conclusion

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Relevant Articles
-
Where next for China?: User fees increase China's health challenges
- Saroj A Jayasinghe
BMJ 2006 333: 499-500.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
-
Health in Africa: It's time for good guidelines on health financing practice
- Douglas E Ball
BMJ 2005 331: 904-905.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
-
Health in Africa: Let's learn from the success stories from other poor countries...
- Saroj Jayasinghe
BMJ 2005 331: 905.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
-
User fees should be dropped in sub-Saharan Africa
BMJ 2005 331: 0.
[Full Text]
-
Impact on child mortality of removing user fees: simulation model
- Chris James, Saul S Morris, Regina Keith, and Anna Taylor
BMJ 2005 331: 747-749.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Perkins, M., Brazier, E., Themmen, E., Bassane, B., Diallo, D., Mutunga, A., Mwakajonga, T., Ngobola, O.
(2009). Out-of-pocket costs for facility-based maternity care in three African countries. Health Policy Plan
24: 289-300
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Kruk, M. E., Goldmann, E., Galea, S.
(2009). Borrowing And Selling To Pay For Health Care In Low- And Middle-Income Countries. Health Aff (Millwood)
28: 1056-1066
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Molyneux, C., Hutchison, B., Chuma, J., Gilson, L.
(2007). The role of community-based organizations in household ability to pay for health care in Kilifi District, Kenya. Health Policy Plan
22: 381-392
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Jayasinghe, S. A
(2006). Where next for China? User fees increase China's health challenges.. BMJ
333: 499-500
[Full text]
-
Jayasinghe, S.
(2005). Health in Africa: Let's learn from the success stories from other poor countries.... BMJ
331: 905-905
[Full text]
-
Ball, D. E
(2005). Health in Africa: It's time for good guidelines on health financing practice. BMJ
331: 904-905
[Full text]
Rapid Responses:
Read all Rapid Responses
- Costs of introducing user fees: the poor paid the bill
- Saroj Jayasinghe
bmj.com, 5 Oct 2005
[Full text]