Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;331:635 (17 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7517.635-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EditorThe study by Draper et al omitted most cases near power lines of 132 kV.1 The United Kingdom has 10 000 circuit km of 400 kV lines and 4000 circuit km of 275 kV lines, but 20 000 circuit km of 132 kV lines and more than 260 000 pole mounted transformers.2 Should the effect be found near these lower voltage sources, then saying that only five cases per year would result becomes a dramatic understatement. Major residential exposure to electromagnetic fields is not from power lines but from home appliances and wiring, and these could also augment incidence.
At 50 Hz no association exists between strengths of electromagnetic fields since people who are exposed are in the source's near field. Magnetic fields from power lines will attenuate at 1/r3, whereas electric fields may attenuate only at the simple reciprocal, thereby still exceeding average levels much further away, accelerated
Roger W Coghill, research director
Coghill Research Laboratories, Lower Race, Pontypool NP4 5UH roger@cogreslab.co.uk
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+