BMJ  2005;331:577 (10 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7516.577-d

Letter

Cardiac impairment or heart failure?

Time for total political correctness?

The first 100% of the full text of this article appears below.

EDITOR—Lehman et al point out that the term "cardiac failure" is less than helpful. It confuses doctors and it demoralises patients.1 Cardiac impairment may be, as they suggest, "kinder, and more accurate."

It is still not quite in tune with the politically correct culture of the past couple of decades.2 We would suggest a more appropriate, and current, term, "cardiac deferred success." It really implies no blame to anyone: much better.

Bernard A Foëx, consultant in emergency medicine and critical care

bernard.foex@cmmc.nhs.uk
Department of Emergency Medicine, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester M13 9WL

Simon Carley, locum consultant in emergency medicine

Department of Emergency Medicine, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester M13 9WL


Competing interests: None declared.

  1. Lehman R, Doust J, Glasziou P. Cardiac impairment or heart failure? BMJ 2005;331: 415-6. (20-27 August.)[Free Full Text]
  2. Michel T. The guide to politically correct cardiology. J Irreproducible Results 1993:39(6): 7-8.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Cardiac impairment or heart failure?
Richard Lehman, Jenny Doust, and Paul Glasziou
BMJ 2005 331: 415-416. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ