Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;331:577 (10 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7516.577-c
| The first 100% of the full text of this article appears below. |
EDITORThe editorial by Lehman et al debates renaming heart failure.1 We agree from our research that many patients do not understand what the term heart failure means. We believe that it would be a shame to substitute the word "heart" with "cardiac": this may cause more confusion as many patients may not know what the word cardiac means.
We interviewed 40 patients from around the country at different stages of heart failure, and many of them discussed their confusion about the meaning of heart failureseveral said that the word failure was unhelpful (these interviews can be seen on www.dipex.org/heartfailure).
Before officially renaming, it might be helpful to have a wider debate about this and ask patients for their opinions.
Kate H Field, senior qualitative researcher
kate.field@dphpc.ox.ac.uk
Department of Primary Care, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF
Ann McPherson, part time lecturer
Department of Primary Care, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF