BMJ  2005;331:577 (10 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7516.577-c

Letter

Cardiac impairment or heart failure?

What do patients really think?

The first 100% of the full text of this article appears below.

EDITOR—The editorial by Lehman et al debates renaming heart failure.1 We agree from our research that many patients do not understand what the term heart failure means. We believe that it would be a shame to substitute the word "heart" with "cardiac": this may cause more confusion as many patients may not know what the word cardiac means.

We interviewed 40 patients from around the country at different stages of heart failure, and many of them discussed their confusion about the meaning of heart failure—several said that the word failure was unhelpful (these interviews can be seen on www.dipex.org/heartfailure).

Before officially renaming, it might be helpful to have a wider debate about this and ask patients for their opinions.

Kate H Field, senior qualitative researcher

kate.field@dphpc.ox.ac.uk
Department of Primary Care, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF

Ann McPherson, part time lecturer

Department of Primary Care, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF


Competing interests: Both authors have done research on heart failure in 2003 for DIPEx, University of Oxford.

  1. Lehman R, Doust J, Glasziou P. Cardiac impairment or heart failure? BMJ 2005;331: 415-6. (20-27 August.)[Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Cardiac impairment or heart failure?
Richard Lehman, Jenny Doust, and Paul Glasziou
BMJ 2005 331: 415-416. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ