BMJ  2005;331:577 (10 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7516.577-a

Letter

Cardiac impairment or heart failure?

"Impairment" is no less alarming or confusing than "failure"

The first 100% of the full text of this article appears below.

EDITOR—Lehman et al consider the term "heart failure" to be imprecise and confusing, preferring "cardiac impairment."1

However, the term "cardiac impairment" is as vague and blurred. It is not more descriptive or less confusing. Impairment also covers a wide spectrum or continuum. Paradoxically, it may not reflect the seriousness of the diagnosis, especially in late stages of heart failure when the prognosis may be more serious than that for many malignancies.

Whatever term is used, doctors can avoid confusion by explaining that failure, like many things in life and medicine, is a spectrum, and it does not mean the end. Also patients should be given time and encouragement to ask questions and air fears and concerns.

Atef Michael, specialist registrar

Queen's Hospital, Burton on Trent DE15 0AR a.michael2@ukonline.co.uk


Competing interests: None declared.

  1. Lehman R, Doust J, Glasziou P. Cardiac impairment or heart failure? BMJ 2005;331: 415-6. (20-27 August.)[Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Cardiac impairment or heart failure?
Richard Lehman, Jenny Doust, and Paul Glasziou
BMJ 2005 331: 415-416. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ