Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;331:577 (10 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7516.577-a
| The first 100% of the full text of this article appears below. |
EDITORLehman et al consider the term "heart failure" to be imprecise and confusing, preferring "cardiac impairment."1
However, the term "cardiac impairment" is as vague and blurred. It is not more descriptive or less confusing. Impairment also covers a wide spectrum or continuum. Paradoxically, it may not reflect the seriousness of the diagnosis, especially in late stages of heart failure when the prognosis may be more serious than that for many malignancies.
Whatever term is used, doctors can avoid confusion by explaining that failure, like many things in life and medicine, is a spectrum, and it does not mean the end. Also patients should be given time and encouragement to ask questions and air fears and concerns.
Atef Michael, specialist registrar
Queen's Hospital, Burton on Trent DE15 0AR a.michael2@ukonline.co.uk