BMJ  2005;331:575-576 (10 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7516.575-a

Letter

Making prison health care more efficient

The cost may be higher than the price

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR—By focusing on the price of prison health care in the editorial by Awofeso,1 the BMJ has done a major disservice to communities that pay for poor (in both meanings of the word) prison health care in non-fiscal ways.

Cost and price are not interchangeable concepts. The prison is a particular environment that gives access to health care for those who are often excluded in other settings: the price of the care should be set against the cost of its absence.

Degradation of the wider public health—for example, through culturing bloodborne diseases in prisons with inadequate services to prevent needle sharing—and degradation of public order by the reoffending that follows inadequately addressed forensic mental health problems are costs borne by populations but hardly noticed by criminal justice ministers.

While locking fewer people up may keep us safer from disease, it carries political risks that are difficult to take . . . [Full text of this article]

Andrew J Ashworth, general practitioner principal

Davidson's Mains Medical Centre, Edinburgh EH4 5BP andrew.ashworth@lothian.scot.nhs.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Making prison health care more efficient
Niyi Awofeso
BMJ 2005 331: 248-249. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Flint, C. (2005). Government did not suppress health inequalities report. BMJ 331: 698-698 [Full text]  



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ