Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;331:575-576 (10 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7516.575-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORBy focusing on the price of prison health care in the editorial by Awofeso,1 the BMJ has done a major disservice to communities that pay for poor (in both meanings of the word) prison health care in non-fiscal ways.
Cost and price are not interchangeable concepts. The prison is a particular environment that gives access to health care for those who are often excluded in other settings: the price of the care should be set against the cost of its absence.
Degradation of the wider public healthfor example, through culturing bloodborne diseases in prisons with inadequate services to prevent needle sharingand degradation of public order by the reoffending that follows inadequately addressed forensic mental health problems are costs borne by populations but hardly noticed by criminal justice ministers.
While locking fewer people up may keep us safer from disease, it carries political risks that are difficult to take
Andrew J Ashworth, general practitioner principal
Davidson's Mains Medical Centre, Edinburgh EH4 5BP andrew.ashworth@lothian.scot.nhs.uk