Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;331:575 (10 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7516.575
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORThe release of the government's latest report on health inequalities on 11 August was curious.1 2 Reminiscent of the covert release of the Black report on August bank holiday in 1980, the report appeared when the minister for public health was on holiday and her deputy unavailable.
In July 2003 the government stated that there would be an annual report from the Department of Health on health inequality indicators related to the health inequality targets. Nothing appeared for more than two years, although the data that were eventually released had been available for some time,3 and when they did appear it was, conveniently, after the election. Even stranger, the press release for the latest report deflected attention from the key finding of widening inequalities in life expectancy and infant mortality by headlining the 12 "early adopter sites" with their "health trainers."4 The minister said, "Many people have difficulty in
Mary Shaw, reader in medical sociology
Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PR
Danny Dorling, professor of human geography
Department of Geography, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN
Richard Mitchell, associate director
Research Unit in Health, Behaviour and Change, University of Edinburgh Medical School, Edinburgh EH8 9AG
George Davey Smith, professor of clinical epidemiology
Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol George.Davey-Smith@bristol.ac.uk
Read all Rapid Responses