Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;331:448-451 (20 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7514.448
Carlos Tena-Tamayo, national commissioner1, Julio Sotelo, director2
1 National Commission for Medical Arbitration, Mitla #250, Mexico City 03020, Mexico, 2 National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery of Mexico, Insurgentes Sur #3877, Mexico City 14269
Correspondence to: C Tena-Tamayo ctena@conamed.gob.mx
Accusations of malpractice often end in the courts, damaging the doctor-patient relationship and encouraging defensive practice. In Mexico, an alternative system based on arbitration and conciliation has been effective
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Fear of being sued drives some doctors to additional detrimental actions, such as abandoning risky specialties; refusing to treat seriously ill patients; and using clinical records and informed consent forms as means of legal protection, rather than as medical tools.6-8 Differentiation between complications (an unintentional or adverse reaction that aggravates the original
Read all Rapid Responses