BMJ 2005;331:433-434 (20 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.38478.497164.F7 (published 3 June 2005)
Paper
Systematic review of publication bias in studies on publication bias
Hans-Hermann Dubben, senior scientist1,
Hans-Peter Beck-Bornholdt, professor1
1 Institut für Allgemeinmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
Correspondence to: H-H Dubben dubben@uke.uni-hamburg.de
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Introduction
Publication bias is a well known phenomenon in clinical literature,
1
2 in which positive results have a better chance of being published,
are published earlier, and are published in journals with higher
impact factors. Conclusions exclusively based on published studies,
therefore, can be misleading.
3 Selective underreporting of research
might be more widespread and more likely to have adverse consequences
for patients than publication of deliberately falsified data.
1 We investigated whether there is preferential publication of
positive papers on publication bias.
Methods and results
We identified studies that assessed the impact of publication
bias in Medline (January 1993 to October 2003) using the search
terms "publication bias", "citation bias", "language bias",
location bias", "reference bias", or "multiple publication bias".
We also searched the references of a Cochrane review on publication
bias.
4 We restricted the search to publications that primarily
investigated publication bias and whose acceptance therefore
might have depended on whether they had found publication
. . . [Full text of this article]
Comment

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Relevant Articles
-
Review of publication bias in studies on publication bias: Studies on publication bias are probably susceptible to the bias they study
- Fujian Song
BMJ 2005 331: 637-638.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
-
Review of publication bias in studies on publication bias: Meta-research on publication bias does not help transfer research results to patient care
- Peter Kranke
BMJ 2005 331: 638.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
-
Review of publication bias in studies on publication bias: Here's a proposal for editors that may help reduce publication bias
- M Maria Glymour and Ichiro Kawachi
BMJ 2005 331: 638.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
-
Review of publication bias in studies on publication bias: Mandatory publication of data may help
- Jeffrey Mann
BMJ 2005 331: 638.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
-
Review of publication bias in studies on publication bias: Systematic review is needed
- Raeburn B Forbes and Mark McCarron
BMJ 2005 331: 638.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
-
Studies that find publication bias are no more likely to be published than studies that don't
BMJ 2005 331: 0.
[Full Text]
-
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
- Matthias Egger, George Davey Smith, Martin Schneider, and Christoph Minder
BMJ 1997 315: 629-634.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Misleading meta-analysis
- Matthias Egger and George Davey Smith
BMJ 1995 310: 752-754.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Jing, J.-y., Huang, T.-c., Cui, W., Xu, F., Shen, H.-h.
(2009). Should FEV1/FEV6 Replace FEV1/FVC Ratio To Detect Airway Obstruction?: A Metaanalysis. Chest
135: 991-998
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Martin, J. L. R., Sainz-Pardo, M., Furukawa, T. A., Martin-Sanchez, E., Seoane, T., Galan, C.
(2007). Review: Benzodiazepines in generalized anxiety disorder: heterogeneity of outcomes based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. J Psychopharmacol
21: 774-782
[Abstract]
-
SINGH, S. P., GREENWOOD, N., WHITE, S., CHURCHILL, R.
(2007). Ethnicity and the Mental Health Act 1983. Br. J. Psychiatry
191: 99-105
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Decullier, E., Chapuis, F.
(2007). Oral presentation bias: a retrospective cohort study. J. Epidemiol. Community Health
61: 190-193
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Kranke, P.
(2005). Review of publication bias in studies on publication bias: Meta-research on publication bias does not help transfer research results to patient care. BMJ
331: 638-638
[Full text]
-
Song, F.
(2005). Review of publication bias in studies on publication bias: Studies on publication bias are probably susceptible to the bias they study. BMJ
331: 637-638
[Full text]
-
Glymour, M M., Kawachi, I.
(2005). Review of publication bias in studies on publication bias: Here's a proposal for editors that may help reduce publication bias. BMJ
331: 638-638
[Full text]
-
Mann, J.
(2005). Review of publication bias in studies on publication bias: Mandatory publication of data may help. BMJ
331: 638-638
[Full text]
-
Forbes, R. B, McCarron, M.
(2005). Review of publication bias in studies on publication bias: Systematic review is needed. BMJ
331: 638-638
[Full text]
Rapid Responses:
Read all Rapid Responses
- What is publication bias ?
- Evelyne Decullier, et al.
bmj.com, 21 Jun 2005
[Full text]
- Re: What is publication bias ?
- Joseph C Watine
bmj.com, 21 Jun 2005
[Full text]
- Re: Re: What is publication bias ?
- Evelyne Decullier, et al.
bmj.com, 23 Jun 2005
[Full text]
- Re: Re: Re: What is publication bias ?
- Joseph C Watine
bmj.com, 28 Jun 2005
[Full text]
- Studies on publication bias are likely susceptible to the bias they studied
- Fujian Song, et al.
bmj.com, 16 Jul 2005
[Full text]
- Meta-research on publication bias does not help transfer research results to patient care
- Peter Kranke, MD
bmj.com, 19 Aug 2005
[Full text]
- Has Evidence Based Medicine Lost its Way?
- Raeburn B Forbes, et al.
bmj.com, 22 Aug 2005
[Full text]
- Re: Has Evidence Based Medicine Lost its Way?
- Joseph C Watine
bmj.com, 23 Aug 2005
[Full text]
- Sparse search strategy
- Jafar Kolahi, et al.
bmj.com, 29 Aug 2005
[Full text]
- A proposal to reduce publication bias
- M. Maria Glymour, et al.
bmj.com, 7 Sep 2005
[Full text]
- A less modest proposal
- Jeffrey Mann
bmj.com, 8 Sep 2005
[Full text]
- Publication bias: Responses and a proposal from the Declaration of Helsinki
- Hans-Hermann Dubben
bmj.com, 22 Apr 2006
[Full text]