Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;331:406 (13 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7513.406-b
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORAn increasing amount of medical student teaching is being based in the community, as it is becoming increasingly recognised that this is where most consultations take place. Benson et al report on combining quantitative and qualitative methods in exploring the views of patients participating in teaching.1 They start their discussion by saying that participation in teaching by general practitioners and student doctors had no negative impact on patients.
Patients have always been an essential part of medical education, but we cannot assume that they choose to participate.2-4 In our randomised controlled trial in 22 teaching practices we calculated the influence of the presence of doctors in training on the blood pressure of patients.5 We found that in teaching practices the presence of a doctor in training had a notable effect when an experienced general practitioner measured a patient's blood pressure. We came to the following conclusions.
Firstly, although
Jan H Matthys, vocational trainer
University of Ghent, 9000 Ghent, Belgium matthys.jan@pandora.be
Read all Rapid Responses