Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;331:406 (13 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7513.406-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORDiscussion of the forthcoming World Health Organization growth charts and their possible adoption in the United Kingdom is welcome but neds to be focused on the issues.
Wright asks whether the growth charts that we currently use are inaccurate, particularly in applying them to breastfed babies.1 Although this is an interesting and important question, a more illuminating one might be: "Are we using growth charts appropriately?" If all who plot infant growth were aware that the shape of breastfed baby growth centiles differs from those of artificially fed infants, and if routine weight monitoring were matched with routine assessment of skilled breast feeding, current charts would probably be perfectly adequate. As Wright notes, the babies whose data are included in the new chart received ongoing support for breastfeeding and therefore show the pattern that infants can attain when their mothers are supported appropriately.
UK mothers seem to pick
Magda Sachs, PhD student
Department of Midwifery Studies, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE magda@sachsdavis.clara.net
Read all Rapid Responses