BMJ  2005;331:406 (13 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7513.406-a

Letter

Baby growth needs proper re-evaluation

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR—Discussion of the forthcoming World Health Organization growth charts and their possible adoption in the United Kingdom is welcome but neds to be focused on the issues.

Wright asks whether the growth charts that we currently use are inaccurate, particularly in applying them to breastfed babies.1 Although this is an interesting and important question, a more illuminating one might be: "Are we using growth charts appropriately?" If all who plot infant growth were aware that the shape of breastfed baby growth centiles differs from those of artificially fed infants, and if routine weight monitoring were matched with routine assessment of skilled breast feeding, current charts would probably be perfectly adequate. As Wright notes, the babies whose data are included in the new chart received ongoing support for breastfeeding and therefore show the pattern that infants can attain when their mothers are supported appropriately.

UK mothers seem to pick . . . [Full text of this article]

Magda Sachs, PhD student

Department of Midwifery Studies, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE magda@sachsdavis.clara.net


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

More confused—but better informed
Jane Smith
BMJ 2005 331: 0. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Growth charts for babies
Charlotte M Wright
BMJ 2005 330: 1399-1400. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Even more confused--and quite disillusioned
Tam S Fry
bmj.com, 12 Aug 2005 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ