Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;331:353 (6 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7512.353-b
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORIn his editorial on the future of singlehanded general practices Majeed makes a plea for the continuation of single-handed general practice in UK primary care.1
I have experienced the growth of a practice from a small to a large partnership, then the trauma of divorcing myself from partnership and creating a singlehanded practice, which through necessity had to grow to accommodate the requirements and, sometimes, inappropriate demands of the NHS. I thus have much practical experience of the benefits and problems associated with practice dynamics.
Some 15 years ago I proposed to our local general practitioners that we should continue working in our own local practices but be linked to a central hub for administrative and "shared" resources. Such shared resources could be services currently provided under enhanced servicesminor operations, family planning, and childhood immunisations, to name but a few. Maintaining independent but linked practices allows individual doctors
Nigel Higson, general practitioner
Hove, West Sussex BN3 3DX surgery@goodwoodcourt.org