BMJ  2005;331:353 (6 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7512.353

Letter

Where next with revalidation?

Political will does not exist for radical reform

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR—Walshe and Benson underline the importance of the primary mission to protect the public.1 But little is written in their article about the inadequate arrangements for managers—deemed to be a group of professionals at the Bristol inquiry—that still exist behind closed doors rather than in the public domain. Just as a list of wayward doctors can be reeled off, it would be possible to reel off a list of managers who have not acted in a way compatible with "professional" codes; unlike doctors, rather than being held to account, the managers are often simply and quietly moved on, sometimes into another healthcare post.

The accusation levelled at doctors and other healthcare professionals by Walshe and Benson, of blocking or watering down reforms, is probably valid, but it can be equally applied to managers, as can the accusations of looking after self interest rather than the interests of the . . . [Full text of this article]

Nigel Dudley, consultant in elderly medicine

St James's University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF nigel.dudley@leedsth.nhs.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Time for radical reform
Kieran Walshe and Lawrence Benson
BMJ 2005 330: 1504-1506. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ