BMJ  2005;331:352-353 (6 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7512.352-c

Letter

Where next with revalidation?

Make CME and CPD compulsory with support of audit and mentoring

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR—Walsh and Benson say that changes to UK professional regulation have lacked strategic direction, that the current reviews offer an opportunity for fundamental reform that can regain public confidence, and that public and political faith in the professions and their regulators is lower than ever before.1 However, despite a small number of high profile (and very frequently cited) cases, the public continues to give doctors an approval rating of some 90% in the BMA's annual poll. Politicians, lawyers, and journalists tend to receive trust ratings in the order of 20%. It is these latter groups whose voices are loudest in calling for ever increasing regulation of doctors.

The public are wise enough to recognise that the appalling crimes of Shipman were a one off. This evil man would have sailed through any revalidation process, and it is bogus to cite his uniquely evil deeds as an argument to . . . [Full text of this article]

Stephen F Hayes, freelance general practitioner

Bitterne Walk In Centre, Southampton stephen.hayes1@virgin.net


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Time for radical reform
Kieran Walshe and Lawrence Benson
BMJ 2005 330: 1504-1506. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ