Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;331:320 (6 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.38524.543137.7C (published 1 July 2005)
Norman J Vetter, reader in public health1
1 Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff CF14 4XL njvetter@hotmail.com
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Intermediate care had the characteristics of much new national policy when it was launched; it lacked definition, had no evidence for its effectiveness, and was aimed at solving a problem that it was unlikely to impact onin this case overcrowding in hospitals. It is therefore good to see new evidence on the effectiveness of a service that fits under the umbrella term "intermediate care" compared with care in a district general hospital department for the care of elderly people, as reported by Green et al.1
The relation between older people and hospitals is a complex one. A suspicion among several eminent commentators is that ageism is still endemic in the NHS, keeping older people out of the bright sparkling general hospitals because they overstay their welcome.2 A further suspicion is that the National Service Framework for older people is complicit in this, with its emphasis on an extra 5000 intermediate
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?