Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;331:310 (6 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7512.310
Geoff Watts
London
Assailed by critics, battered by rising costs, and investigated by the National Audit Office, the multibillion pound attempt to utilise 21st century information technology in storing patients' records, booking appointments, and handling prescriptions is not having an easy ride. The man ultimately responsible for the scheme is Richard Granger
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
"Three years ago, quite a lot of people were of the opinion that this was mission impossible. It was just absolutely not achievable." The man speaking is Richard Granger. The allegedly unachievable goal is the national plan to revolutionise the NHS's information technology. And the people with the negative view of its likely success include a great many doctors.
Or rather: included (past tense). Three years on, Grangerthe information technology supremo at the Department of Healththinks that many more doctors have come to accept that it can be done. Their earlier scepticism, he concedes, was justified. "Computer systems are inordinately difficult to introduce into complex clinical settings. This is not like putting in a transaction processing system for a bank." But now, he claims, the debate has moved from mission impossible to a more informed discussion about methods, approaches, and priorities.
|
|
Credit: CONNECTINGFORHEALTH
|
Revamping and expanding the NHS's entire information
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses