Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;331:292 (30 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7511.292
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORVidal et al are rightly concerned that information on dose adjustment is not as well supported by evidence as our knowledge about the effectiveness of modern interventions (p 263). 1 But, as they have found, the lack of robust data to guide clinicians on the precautions to take when using drugs is woeful. Therefore, their conclusions come as no surprise to compilers of drug information.
|
Because there are few accessible studies on dose adjustment in renal impairment, the British National Formulary (BNF) has to rely on summaries of product characteristics, which reflect data submitted for gaining marketing authorisation. However, the BNF continually adjusts its position as clinically relevant information emerges; this process is summarised in appendix 2 of Vidal et al's paper.
Vidal et al's comparison of information on drugs in renal impairment was prompted by the need to populate a computerised decision support system.
Dinesh K Mehta, executive editor
British National Formulary, Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain, London SE1 7JN dmehta@bnf.org