Investigating allegations of scientific misconduct

doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7511.245

BMJ 2005;331:245-246 (30 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7511.245

Editorial

Investigating allegations of scientific misconduct

Journals can do only so much; institutions need to be willingto investigate

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

In this issue we take the unusual step of publishing an "expressionof concern" (p 266)¹ about a paper the BMJ published in 1992,²together with an account of our attempts to resolve the suspicionsabout this and other papers written by the author, Dr Ram BSingh of Moradabad, India (p 281).³ The BMJ's expression ofconcern coincides with a similar expression about another ofSingh's papers in this week's Lancet.

As White describes in her article,³ doubts about the validityof the data in Singh's 1992 paper arose soon after we had publishedit—when Singh sent us a succession of other studies. Thereviewers of the subsequent papers alerted us to discrepanciesin the data, and to doubts about Singh's work that were alreadywell known among researchers into diet and coronary heart disease.

What should journal editors do when confronted . . . [Full text of this article]

Jane Smith, deputy editor

BMJ

Fiona Godlee, editor

BMJ
(fgodlee@bmj.com)

CiteULike

Complore

Connotea

Del.icio.us Add to Digg

Digg

StumbleUpon Add to Technorati

Technorati What's this?

Relevant Articles

Managing suspected research misconduct: Charles Young and Fiona Godlee
BMJ 2007 334: 378-379. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

The GMC: out of its depth?: Fiona Godlee
BMJ 2005 331: 0. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Expression of concern
BMJ 2005 331: 266. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Are these data real? Statistical methods for the detection of data fabrication in clinical trials: Sanaa Al-Marzouki, Stephen Evans, Tom Marshall, and Ian Roberts
BMJ 2005 331: 267-270. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Suspected research fraud: difficulties of getting at the truth: Caroline White
BMJ 2005 331: 281-288. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Investigating the previous studies of a fraudulent author: Richard Smith
BMJ 2005 331: 288-291. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Role of multivitamins and mineral supplements in preventing infections in elderly people: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
BMJ 2005 331: 142. [Full Text] [PDF]

Dealing with editorial misconduct: Fiona Godlee
BMJ 2004 329: 1301-1302. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Three journals raise doubts on validity of Canadian studies: Caroline White
BMJ 2004 328: 67. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

Young, C., Godlee, F. (2007). Managing suspected research misconduct. BMJ 334: 378-379 [Full text]
Newman, A, Jones, R (2006). Authorship of research papers: ethical and professional issues for short-term researchers.. J. Med. Ethics 32: 420-423 [Abstract] [Full text]
Sox, H. C., Rennie, D. (2006). Research Misconduct, Retraction, and Cleansing the Medical Literature: Lessons from the Poehlman Case. ANN INTERN MED 144: 609-613 [Abstract] [Full text]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

TIME FOR INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH REGULATORY BODY: DEV SRIVASTAVA, et al.
bmj.com, 30 Jul 2005 [Full text]
Scientific misconduct- suspicion and action: V Raman Kutty
bmj.com, 1 Aug 2005 [Full text]
Drum out the Myth Makers: Tom A Braun
bmj.com, 1 Aug 2005 [Full text]
Public Data?: J A Delaney
bmj.com, 2 Aug 2005 [Full text]
Sentencing for scientific fraud: is punishment enough?: Cathy Popadiuk
bmj.com, 3 Aug 2005 [Full text]
The use of systematic reviews for editorial peer reviewing: a population approach: Iain Chalmers
bmj.com, 3 Aug 2005 [Full text]
Basis for research: Oliver R Dearlove
bmj.com, 5 Aug 2005 [Full text]
Research needs policing: Sashidhar Yeluri, et al.
bmj.com, 26 Aug 2005 [Full text]