Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;331:161 (16 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7509.161
| The first 100% of the full text of this article appears below. |
EDITORSurprisingly, Elwood et al let the medical profession off the hook about the risks of aspirin prophylaxis for myocardial infarction.1 To put the onus of decision taking on the patient, instead of the doctor being an informed mentor in the fight against vascular disease, is alarming.
How is the concept that "each person, not a doctor, should evaluate the risks and benefits" valuable in making a decision to a patient who is unaware of drugs and pharmacotherapeutics? The authors also advise that patients "are likely to accept a small increased risk of bleed or other side effect in exchange for a reduced risk of a heart attack or stroke." This is indirectly offered medical advice from doctors. Passing the buck is impossible when the buck stops here, in the consulting room.
Arunachalam Kumar, professor of anatomy
Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore 575001, India ixedoc@sulekha.com