Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;331:159 (16 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7509.159-b
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORThe study reported by Hippisley-Cox and Coupland leads to much generalisation.1 Firstly, I am concerned that the data on angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, contradict convention. Secondly, without actual data in front of me, I have to guess at the meaning of the ACE inhibitor data.
As the EUROPA, PROGRESS, ANBP, PEACE, TRACE, SAVE, and HOPE studies have shown, there is a great disparity in efficacy of ACE inhibitors. As Doulton et al say in their review of ACE inhibitor and angiotensin receptor blocker trials, the ACE inhibitor trials were described as mostly using submaximal doses or a once daily dose of shorter acting ACE inhibitors.2 It has long been known that the more efficacious trials of ACE inhibitors used a large dose, as the perindopril investigators found out in PROGRESS and EUROPA. The trandalopril investigators also saw this disparity in PEACE and TRACE. What were the ACE
Frank A Snyder, physician
Wilmington Internal Medicine 2215 Canterwood, Wilmington, NC 28401, USA slude1@aol.com