Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;330:1508 (25 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7506.1508-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORRahemtulla and Bhopal focus on the heart failure drug BiDil to explore the "resurgence of the role of biology in concepts of race and ethnicity."1 BiDil, a combination of two generic drugs (hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate) that have been used for years to treat heart failure, is currently undergoing review by the US Food and Drug Administration for approval as the first ever drug with a race specific indicationto treat heart failure in African-Americans.
The authors assert that the major implication of BiDil is that differential responses to treatment between racial groups are attributed primarily to genetic differences. Unfortunately, this is precisely not the major medical implication of BiDil, but rather the major popular misreading of BiDil. The A-HeFT trials, on which the BiDil submission is based, enrolled only self identified African-Americans.2 There was no comparison population, therefore the results say nothing about whether BiDil works differently or
Jonathan D Kahn, assistant professor of law
Hamline University School of Law, 1526 Hewitt Avenue, St Paul, MN 55104, USA jkahn01@hamline.edu