Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;330:1508 (25 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7506.1508
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORDyer reported that parents wrongfully accused of child abuse cannot sue doctors.1 When doctors are required to report abuse but are given unlimited immunity for reporting a suspicion of child abuse, over-reporting seems likely. The most serious problem arises when suspicions become formal diagnoses.
In my practice, I regularly see charts in which the first person to raise a suspicion of abuse is considered to have made a definitive and incontrovertible diagnosis. Subsequent consultants echo it, and it is assumed to be fact. Except when a medical student sees the child, there is seldom the barest outline of a differential diagnosis anywhere in the record. Such failure to consider, and systematically exclude, alternative explanations for the child's signs and symptoms represents tunnel vision and often precludes further investigation. It is poor medicine that would, in any other setting, be ample grounds for a negligence action.
At minimum, a
Peter J Stephens, forensic pathologist
100 Club Drive, Suite 135, Burnsville, NC 28714, USA pjstephens@ccvn.com